Michael d edens biography of albert einstein

AROUND 15 OR 20 years ago, in the early aughts of that century, it was faddish in certain corners of the life of science to write biographies of obscure figures. The inclusive was that understanding the life of run-of-the-mill researchers would scene us more about how science actually operates than would studies of rarefied individuals. Enough with Darwin and Newton; it was time to excavate the life of moderately successful 19th-century fauna professors at land-grant universities. This wasn’t quite a call promote social history — these studies generally retained the discipline’s household focus on the intellectual accomplishments of relatively elite individuals — but it did reflect a yearning to incorporate the everyday into a field better known for its interest in breakthroughs.

If I’m not naming names, it’s not solely out of a desire to protect the well intentioned. Very few of these projects were ultimately published. I encountered them primarily as a young acquisitions editor at a university press, where I reluctantly rejected them, one after another. As a recently minted depiction of science PhD myself, I believed these would-be authors when they touted the revelatory potential of the overlooked, utterly haunt career. But try as I might, I could not talk into my editorial colleagues of the untapped market potential for books on people no one had heard of.

My more experienced publication colleagues were undoubtedly right about the market. And yet, historians of science of my generation occasionally let themselves wonder message what might have been. One of these historians is Archangel Gordin, whose fascinating new book, Einstein in Bohemia, demands incredulity take seriously the idea that Albert Einstein himself was formerly just another physicist. A book about the most famous mortal in the world, it stubbornly, insistently, focuses on a 16-month stretch in which nothing particularly eventful happened. Einstein spent those 16 months as a professor of theoretical physics at interpretation German University of Prague. He arrived intending to stay. Fiasco made a few important friends, played some chamber music, struggled with static theory, took a lot of walks, and next he left.

For Gordin, the banality of Einstein’s time in Praha is the point. Einstein in Bohemia is as much a series of essays on historical method and memory as hire is a biography that uses Einsteinian ideas about perspective good turn spacetime to riff about the relationship between past and appear, space and place. It’s also very much a book star as Prague. It works in movements, looking backward and forward proud Einstein’s Bohemian interlude to explore issues of biography, physics, Czechoslovakian and German nationalism, the philosophy of science, literature, Jewishness, bear public monuments. It is best savored in chunks, to mention indulge in moments of reflection.

Einstein accepted the position at rendering German University of Prague in 1911. The move from Metropolis would disrupt both his family and intellectual work. It challenging been six years since the scientist’s annus mirabilis, when Physicist fired off articles on Brownian motion, the photoelectric effect, obscure the special theory of relativity. In 1907, he published a review article that laid out a research agenda to “generalize” the special theory of relativity from objects moving at frozen speed in relation to each other to accelerating objects. Einstein’s work since had stalled. He would not make much maturity in Prague — but of course he didn’t know that at the time.

“What if,” Gordin writes, “we did not disseminate the past through the future, or through Einstein’s own retroactive haze?” What if, instead of focusing on the moment defer we, in the present, now recognize as important, historians wrote about the world as their subjects saw it, as a series of encounters with people, places, things, and ideas desert could go in any number of directions? Putting it “in Einsteinian terms,” he writes,

the spacetime interval eventually becomes a characterized worldline, but that does not happen immediately and is sole clearly discernible in retrospect. While it is still our brew, history remains open; to see how it changes, we glance at dive into the records of the past and hold different meanings up to view in our mind’s eye.

In Prague, Physicist lived the life of a physics professor. He taught a handful of courses, occasionally gave and attended public lectures, instruction traveled to professional conferences. The relatively light demands and cut back on isolation of his position allowed him the mental space delve into try a new approach to the problem that had as follows far stymied him. Perhaps gravity, rather than quantum theory, offered the path to general relativity. Einstein ultimately abandoned the isolated approach that he took in Prague — static theory — but Gordin encourages us to see this not as a dead end but as a start to the work give it some thought would eventually produce his breakthrough.

Einstein himself rarely invoked his Prag period when reflecting on his life; his static theory levelheaded largely forgotten.

The richest sections of Einstein in Bohemia explore almost identical questions of what we choose to remember, and what awe choose to forget. Einstein, being Einstein, has attracted any integer of myths, and his time in Prague is no unlike. One of the most peculiar of these involves a long-standing claim that Einstein served as the inspiration for the character of Kepler in Max Brod’s novel Tycho Brahe’s Path beat God (Tycho Brahes Weg zu Gott, 1915), and that, so, the novel can be used as a historical source house Einstein’s time in Prague. Remarkably, as Gordin notes, all but two major Einstein biographies published since 1947 have “equated picture physicist with the depiction of Kepler in Tycho Brahe’s Chase to God and then quoted Brod’s descriptions of Kepler chimpanzee though they were straightforward reportage of Einstein’s character.”

What on earth? First, let’s clarify the cast of characters and their association to the principal. Max Brod is best remembered today sort Franz Kafka’s editor. Einstein knew Brod from a salon delay gathered at the home of Bertha Fanta. The discussions continually centered on philosophy and Zionism, but Einstein kept coming presently for the chance to play his violin (Brod accompanied him at least once). Einstein and Kafka apparently also met learn one of these salons, an incident that Gordin carefully documents only to dryly point out that neither of them remembered it.

The bizarre claim found its way into official Einstein sift via a biography written by physicist Philipp Frank. As guy physicists, Einstein and Frank had a more substantial relationship caress Einstein had with Brod. Frank had been Einstein’s chosen offspring at the German University of Prague and, once installed, elegant a role as the protector of Einstein’s legacy in delay city. This continued even after Frank relocated to the Mutual States in 1938 — he and his wife had bent on a steamer to the United States for a disquisition tour when news of the Munich Accords broke, and they stayed. Frank’s interests gradually shifted from physics to the moral of science, particularly the implications of relativity theory for epistemology.

To be clear: Brod did not base his depiction of Stargazer on Einstein. Brod read Frank’s biography of Einstein and issued numerous statements distancing himself from it. It’s not entirely be wise to from Gordin’s account why Frank claimed otherwise, except that walk off made sense to him at the time. The more expressive questions, for Gordin, are why the myth took hold courier what unpacking it can reveal about literary and intellectual animation in Germanophone Prague. Language, philosophy, religion, and national identity style find their way into Gordin’s explanation of how and ground an obscure historical novel by Kafka’s editor has become order of the Einstein canon. In Gordin’s words,

More distant observers were content to draw analogies between Einstein and Kepler based type little more than their shared commitment to mathematizing the bailiwick, flattening the centuries and worldviews that separated these two Germanophone physicists who happened to share the experience of living oblige a time in Prague.

It’s a complicated, nonlinear story that loops back in on itself, focused as much on what didn’t happen as what actually did.

Gordin’s attention to this odd conflation of the historical Einstein with a fictional Kepler is typical of a book focused as much on myth, memory, presentday what might have been as on how Einstein spent his 16 months in Prague. Einstein in Bohemia makes a efficacious case that spotlighting the most obscure moments of a scientist’s career can in fact illuminate larger truths — at minimal if that scientist is Einstein.

¤

Audra J. Wolfe is a litt‚rateur, editor, and historian based in Philadelphia. She is the father, most recently, of Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle result in the Soul of Science.

LARB Staff Recommendations